Proposed merge with Archive Manager

edit

There is only a single line of content - not enough of an independent article 🍺 Antiqueight confer 11:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

There isn't anything to merge, since it's already mentioned in this article. If it can be expanded, it can reasonably stay, since I'm finding appropriate coverage of the product itself, but otherwise I'd delete it. I'd say redirect except that "archive manager" is a generic term, and there could just as easily be a Microsoft Archive Manager, a Symantec Archive Manager, etc. Well, maybe a redirect anyway, until there's a reason to disambiguate. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cool - I'll go back and look again - I have to admit I didn't see it mentioned but I was on lunch so easily distracted. Thanks!-- 🍺 Antiqueight confer 22:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Metalogix Software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edit request

edit

Hello, I'm proposing edits to the page to correct any sentences and phrases that were identified as copyrighted material from https://www.quest.com/metalogix/.

Kburnside 13 (talk) 22:46, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Kburnside 13, and thank you for your suggestions. I'm afraid your edit request is going to be  Not done, as even with your proposed changes, the article would still need a significant amount of work. At least you've helped fix some of the copy-paste issues. But other wordings remain too closely paraphrased for me to feel comfortable accepting, for instance, the first and second edits.
Additionally, the article has broader problems that have not been fixed. We need to have more citations to independent sources; right now, the article relies too much on Metalogix's website and press releases from CMSWire. The article needs to do less marketing and feel less like a product catalog. I'd recommend taking a look at Microsoft Office to get an idea of how to describe products non-promotionally.
Because of these underlying problems, I see no immediate solution except for radically trimming the article's content. I regret having to take the painful step of removing so much of what you have written, but you are free to propose a second round of revisions (and make another edit request), and you may access the article versions you wrote in the page history. Please feel free to contact me or other Wikipedia editors if you have any questions. Best, Altamel (talk) 02:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply