Expanding the article to talk about menstruation experienced by men

edit

Hi,

I think this article doesn't talk about menstruation experienced by men. Can you please expand the article with more information about it? 188.142.192.136 (talk) 21:36, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'd also like to see this change made; More gender-neutral language, also calling menstrual products just that as opposed to feminine hygiene products. AcidicRhythmist (talk) 04:19, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
i don't know ~2026-21950-91 (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
yes, as a feminist who is a part of the 2SLGBTQQIA+ community, menstruation is not a girls only experience GLTR GRL (talk) 23:46, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Suggested addition to the "Menstrual Fluid" section

edit


This blood contains sodium, calcium, phosphate, iron, and chloride, the extent of which depends on the woman. As well as blood, the fluid consists of cervical mucus, vaginal secretions, and endometrial tissue.
+
This blood contains sodium, calcium, phosphate, iron, and chloride, the extent of which depends on the individual. Menstrual blood also contains multi-potent mesenchymal-like stem cells. As well as blood, the fluid consists of cervical mucus, vaginal secretions, and endometrial tissue.

I think the sentence above should be added because it reflects new research and updates our understanding of menstrual fluid.

[1] [2]


~2025-32833-23 (talk) 00:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. Faramarzi, Hossein et al. “The Potential of Menstrual Blood-Derived Stem Cells in Differentiation to Epidermal Lineage: A Preliminary Report.” World journal of plastic surgery vol. 5,1 (2016): 26-31.
  2. Maryam Rahnama, Navid Ghasemzadeh, Zeinab Latifi, Fatemeh Kheradmand, Fariba Abbasi Koukia, Khan Sharun, Ali Golchin, Menstrual blood and endometrial mesenchymal stem/stromal cells: A frontier in regenerative medicine and cancer therapy, European Journal of Pharmacology, Volume 1000, 2025, 177726, ISSN 0014-2999,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.177726.
Not done for now: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Chess enjoyer (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
It would seem the IP did give two RS? That said, I have not verified the claim and I also do not know if the way it has been written is something I'd endorse. I also don't know how relevant or important this is to add here.
Slomo666 (talk) 13:48, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply