Talk:Luis de Miranda
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Phew!
editPhew! I came to this from the Nov. 2011 list of articles needing copy-editing. As a native speaker of English with a decent working knowledge of French, I tried very hard to render the original prose into more nearly standard English. However I confess I find the text under the "Crealism" heading, particularly the 2nd paragraph, absolutely opaque (possibly due to my near-total ignorance of 20th-century philosophy). I do hope I've made the rest of the article a little clearer.OofyProsser (talk) 13:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Problem with the biography
editlet's keep it simple and true, thank you
editHello, I am the living person concerned by this article. I think Wikipedia is a great project and I have donated to support it, but I am unsatisfied with this page and have expressed it before—yet no change was made. This was not originally written by me, contrary to what is suggested by one of the commentators. The information given under Crealism is not accurate and I propose that that paragraph is simply erased. Better nothing than nonsense. The links and sentences referring to a certain Momir Nikic are deceitful and represent a false information that indicates a wrong chronological and conceptual antecedent - take it away please. Also, I am a film director only incidentally. I am primarily a philosopher and now a researcher, a tutor and PhD candidate at the University of Edinburgh. For any questions or details, feel free to contact me : crealiste@gmail.com I have tried to make the changes myself but they are not taken into account, and some Wikirobot keeps erasing my suggestions. Cheers. Luis de Miranda (talk) 16:41, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Luis de Miranda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160808124102/https://anthrobotics.co.uk/ to https://anthrobotics.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
COI edit request: update lead and current academic affiliation
edit| The user below has a request that an edit be made to Luis de Miranda. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 551 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
I am Luis de Miranda, the subject of this article, and I have a conflict of interest. I have disclosed this on my user page. I am therefore requesting review by an independent editor rather than editing the article directly. The current lead is outdated and the article contains several “citation needed” tags around academic status and education.
I propose replacing the current opening paragraph with the following more factual and source-based version: Luis de Miranda (born 15 September 1971) is a Portuguese-French-Swedish philosopher, author, and philosophical practitioner based in Sweden. He is Associate Professor (Docent) in Bioethics at the Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, and a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow at the Turku Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Turku. His work includes books and articles on process philosophy, philosophical health, crealectics, bioethics, artificial intelligence, and the history of esprit de corps. His books include Being and Neonness, Ensemblance: The Transnational Genealogy of Esprit de Corps, Philosophical Health: A Practical Introduction, and Crealectics as a Creative Method.
Suggested sources:
Uppsala University CRB profile: https://www.uu.se/en/centre/crb/about-us/luis-de-miranda
University of Turku / TIAS profile: https://www.utu.fi/en/research/research-collegia/tias/ties
MIT Press page for Being and Neonness: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262538398/being-and-neonness/
Edinburgh University Press page for Ensemblance: https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-ensemblance.html
Bloomsbury page for Philosophical Health: A Practical Introduction: https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/philosophical-health-9781350405035/
Springer/Palgrave page for Crealectics as a Creative Method: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-032-00427-7
I would be grateful if an independent editor could review whether this replacement, or a more neutral version of it, is appropriate. LdMiranda (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
