Talk:Lolito Go
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article was nominated for deletion on 5 February 2026. The result of the discussion was draftify. |
| Lolito Go (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which was archived on 10 February 2026. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Why is the title of the article "Lolito go?"
editHow to change that so that the last name is capitalized? Padreburgos2020 (talk) 01:49, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- There's an option on the upper right to "Move" a page to a new name. I've fixed the name already. Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 04:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. I'm new here. Your guidance is much appreciated. :) Padreburgos2020 (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sir @Ganmatthew please can you make a dedicated Wikipedia Artist Page for "Benjamin Angeles"? He is a well known Filipino Singer-songwriter in the Philippines. You could a lot of reliable references and Articles about "Benjamin Angeles" on google search. ~2026-25403 (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Question regarding
This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view.See our advice if the article is about you and read our scam warning in case someone asks for money to edit this article. |
I would like to ask for clarification regarding the addition of the
This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view.See our advice if the article is about you and read our scam warning in case someone asks for money to edit this article. |
tag.
The presence of a Facebook link alone does not establish paid editing or undisclosed compensation. If there is specific evidence of compensation or a contractual relationship, please point it out so it can be addressed accordingly. Otherwise, the basis for the tag appears speculative.
Given the recent pattern of persistent vandalism on this article, I would suggest extra caution in attributing intent or assuming undisclosed paid editing without clear evidence.
Padreburgos2020 (talk) 02:37, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Padreburgos2020 First of all, Peer review isn't the place to speed up the allegations of undisclosed COI. Linking of their Wikipedia article on their Facebook page is potentially a undisclosed COI (See: Sockuppet investigations of Gobautista when they are not disclosed of paid editing for SB19 Wikipedia Team.) The NPOV and sources isn't issue here since there's many editors are editing here. Also in Commons, address your no permission of your photos that you uploaded.
- (AdobongPogi, thanks for ping me in my talk page, I didn't pay attention here.) ROY is WAR Talk! 07:34, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response, RoyIsWar. I appreciate your insights as well as the expired permission on the photo I uploaded in Commons. It was addressed already. Padreburgos2020 (talk) 23:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
The Article Was Met With Persistent Vandalism
editGiven the recent pattern of persistent vandalism on this article, I would suggest extra caution in attributing intent or assuming undisclosed paid editing without clear evidence. Padreburgos2020 (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Request For "Undisclosed Paid Tag" Review
editDear fellow editors, I humbly request that the "Undisclosed Payment Tag" on this article be reviewed for following reasons:
1. The article was met with persistent vandalism from angry users following a controversy that the subject got himself into. (See edit history)
2. The explanation from the editor (royiswariii) who added the tag was merely speculative.
"Added
This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view.See our advice if the article is about you and read our scam warning in case someone asks for money to edit this article. |
tag: I noticed this from Lolito Go's Facebook page was linked. This is might be a undisclosed paid."
The presence of a Facebook link alone does not establish paid editing or undisclosed compensation. If there is specific evidence of compensation or a contractual relationship, please point it out so it can be addressed accordingly. Otherwise, the basis for the tag appears speculative.
3. The article is generally neutral in tone and is not promotional.
4. The article is very-well sourced with citations from reputable news outlets.
5. The subject of the article meets the notability requirement in his particular field. (OPM music).
I hope this gets noticed and taken action with. Thank you. Padreburgos2020 (talk) 05:31, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Peer review
edit| This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because...
I humbly request that the "Undisclosed Paid Tag" on this article be reviewed for following reasons:
1. The article was met with persistent vandalism from angry users following a controversy that the subject got himself into. (See edit history) 2. The explanation from the editor (royiswariii) who added the tag was merely speculative. "Added This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. tag: I noticed this from Lolito Go's Facebook page was linked. This is might be a undisclosed paid."
The presence of a Facebook link alone does not establish paid editing or undisclosed compensation. If there is specific evidence of compensation or a contractual relationship, please point it out so it can be addressed accordingly. Otherwise, the basis for the tag appears speculative. 3. The article is generally neutral in tone and is not promotional. 4. The article is very-well sourced with citations from reputable news outlets. 5. The subject of the article meets the notability requirement in his particular field. (OPM music). I hope this gets noticed and taken action with.
Thanks, Padreburgos2020 (talk) 17:23, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- I will close this nomination since this is not the inappropriate to discuss here. ROY is WAR Talk! 04:11, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
Feedback from Reviewer
editSince the article was deleted before, this time it at least managed to gain some coverage, unlike in the past when the subject was surrounded by issues. With that, I'm declare that this draft article is now moved to the main page. Congratulations! AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 10:41, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

