Talk:Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2 |
 | A fact from Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 December 2009. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 22, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add alleged use in intelligence operations by the USA during the Russo-Ukrainian war
editAs part of the classified document leak in early 2023, although authenticity of some documents are questionable. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/rq-170-sentinel-stealth-drones-may-have-flown-sorties-off-crimea Memelephant (talk) 09:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- If authenticity is questionable, why should we treat it as a reliable source?Nigel Ish (talk) 13:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Discrepancy in the image caption of Iranian captured drone.
editThe caption for the image "RQ-170 in Iran.jpg" says the image is of an Iranian-built copy of the RQ-170, but the description of the file in Wikimedia Commons says the image is of the drone that Iran downed and captured, not a copy that they built. Should probably verify which is correct and change whichever is incorrect, either the caption or the file's description.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RQ-170_in_Iran.jpg 32.221.113.244 (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Assessed size in Design section in discord with size in Specification section.
editIt seems new information about the size of the drone has been accepted in the Specification section which contradicts the assessment(s) mentioned in the Design section. Perhaps it could be mentioned in the Design section, that the assessed measurements are outdated. Or a larger edit could be made. I’m somewhat rusty with regards to editing, so for now I’ll leave it to others. Bhj dk (talk) 09:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)