Talk:Lit Motors

Latest comment: 1 year ago by TKOIII in topic Conflicts Of Interest

Explanation of gyroscopic stabilisers

edit

I suggest Wikipedia 'gyro monorail' for an explanation of gyroscopic stabilisers, and also the talk page. DavidJErskine (talk) 12:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Newbie's question about objectivity

edit

Hi! I was poking around for motor stuff and thought this article's tone was a little off. For one, it uses the past tense, but I thought this company was still at least trying? And there are a few "many critics say" type statements that are not supported with citations. I've seen lots of live articles flagged for this issue; should this likewise be flagged? It seems like maybe a complicated issue for a newbie to tackle, but I'm willing to give it a shot! Otherwise, can someone more experienced flag it? Thanks so much! Spiegelmama (talk) 22:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Just Look

edit

A quick Google search shows Lit Motors location at 1086 Folsom St, San Francisco, CA 94103 was vacant and up for lease. It appears to have since been leased. Another Google search shows that D. Kim also used to reside at that location (the shop has apartments above) but no longer does. So, you do the math. 50.34.112.51 (talk) 05:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

@50.34.112.51 litmotors.com has an updated copyright notice, and appears to be back. I'd speculate that this is connected to their resolved litigation.
Perhaps this article should use the present tense instead of the past tense? At the same time, I don't know that they have any reputable sources reporting on their revival. Libraryresearch6 (talk) 02:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed revisions

edit

So, first thing is that these edits are pretty extensive, so I'll just put my proposed final revision under the cut at the end of this topic.

Second, let me disclose a possible conflict of interest, as I am a current employee of Lit Motors. Although I have done my best to remain impartial, I'm sure some bias has influenced my edits, and I would appreciate any suggestions that could help improve the objectivity of the article.

With that out of the way, I totally agree with user Spiegelmama's assessment of the article's tone. I can totally sympathize with being disappointed in the lack of progress since the company was founded and annoyed by the CEO's behavior, but vented frustrations should at least be accompanied by good secondary sources. Also, there's been plenty happening with the company since 2022, so I've attempted to include more up-to-date information. Help with finding better/more reliable sources would be appreciated, as a lot of the original sources lead to 404s or broken wayback pages, and the sources I've included are largely from the company website (Also, I'm new to making big edits like this, so there's probably plenty of style errors). New sources will be formatted as links and labeled with an A (e.g., [A13]).

In the meantime, I'm adding a tone and weasel words banner. Assuming no objections, I'll push this edit to the main page after about a week or so.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmoptera (talkcontribs) 22:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit(7/12/24): Pushed changes to the main article. If they get rolled back, please reply to this with reasons and/or suggestions for improvements to make.

Cosmoptera (talk) 21:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Conflicts Of Interest

edit

Multiple major editors of this article have either confirmed or possible conflicts of interest with Lit Motors. Recents edits by user "Jee litmotors" are a clear cut conflict of interest. User "Cosmoptera" has also confirmed they are a Lit employee and declared their COI on this talk page, but still pushes through their own edits. The page's creator, user "Skherson", seems to be either founder Daniel K Kim himself, or someone working for him, as he also authored a Daniel Kim article which was promotional in tone and got deleted. Additionally, the page has been edited by multiple unregistered users whose only edits are to this page, raising more suspicion (although some of these are also critics). This needs to be monitored closely and Lit associated editors need to refrain from making any more edits to the main page. TKOIII (talk) 22:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply