Talk:List of Zenless Zone Zero characters
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Pokelego999 in topic Comments left by AfC reviewers
| This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2025. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Comments left by AfC reviewers
edit
Comment: Was snooping around your talk page and found this draft and decided to review it. However, please do be wary of the concerns brought up at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Zenless Zone Zero characters, as if they are not addressed, it may be nominated in the future. I feel OK accepting this in its current state though. Cheers, and happy editing! veko. (user | talk | contribs) he/him 13:16, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Jeffrey34555 Be sure to look at the concerns brought up by me and other reviewers. veko. (user | talk | contribs) he/him 13:20, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Veko: I have completed a HISTMERGE and deleted the mainspace redirect of List of Zenless Zone Zero characters, so you can accept this draft at your leisure, given the concerns from the AfD are considered. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Veko: Make sure the issues brought up at the previous AfD have been discussed: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Zenless Zone Zero characters. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Please add a reception section about the characters in general so that it does not fail WP:INDISCRIMINATE as an indiscriminate plot list. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:22, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Jeffrey34555 I am very confused by the reversion here. This article was previously merged to Zenless Zone Zero at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Zenless Zone Zero characters last year and the current state of this list is near identical to the version merged previously, except this new incarnation has even less real world info (Needed for notability) and even more overly in-depth plot information. This is inherently not a "new" article and no attempt has been made to indicate that this subject is notable in contrast to prior consensus. It inherently is not meeting notability guidelines as it stands. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:03, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

