Talk:List of Lebanese in Syrian jails
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Lebanese detainees in Syria Because this page is not heavily watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Lebanese detainees in Syria |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | The content of the List of Lebanese in Syrian jails page was merged into Lebanese detainees in Syria on 14 June 2026, and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
Verify
editWe need verification! There is no proof of this being true, you are only copying lists. I've also lowered it on the importance scale. --Lucias21 (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I think this is of very high importance, because it is one of the biggest blocking points between Syria and Lebanon. I think a proper introduction to the list "as claimed by the group SOLIDE" would clear things up. But about the importance, it should be highered again to maybe the highest points. Regards.89.133.136.115 (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Article should be Deleted
editThis whole article has been written according to highly controversial information. It should be deleted and replaced by a 'Lebanese in Syrian jails' where the history of this issue is discussed alongside this supposed list in a seperate tab for it. Not to mention that it's completly unsourceable and articles shouldn't be written according to something like that. I've added some more links to this but the article is completely based upon a subjective point of view, including its name. imo creating that page with the information in this one while replacing the current one with a link to the new page should fix it. I'm afraid I have no clue how to do this myself so I hope someone can do so. --Mark Enlightenment (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Needs a lead section
editThis list article needs a short lead section that explains what the list is and what criteria have been used to compile it. Consequently I have added a {{Lead missing}} clean-up tag. See MOS:LEAD for the purpose of the lead, which is to provide an overview and summary of the article. Having a lead would result in the list appearing after the table of contents, not before it. Also, some of the explanation that appears after the list should probably appear before it, to set the context for the list. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 20:51, 22 March 2025 (UTC)