Talk:Lionsgate Films

IP user comment

This page needs to be edited. Especially in categories there should be categories for hunger games films and for Lionsgate films separate releases.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.198.243.116 (talk) 02:35, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Requested merge

This article should be merged with Lionsgate. 2A02:C7D:564B:D300:F4E6:BFC0:4929:9A34 (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Why? It is a notable subsidiary of [Lionsgate]]. Dimadick (talk) 08:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lionsgate Films. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120114201826/http://www.corporateinformation.com/Company-Snapshot.aspx?cusip=C124E5430 to http://www.corporateinformation.com/Company-Snapshot.aspx?cusip=C124E5430

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 October 2018

In the article, please change "American film production and film and television distribution studio" to "American film production & distribution studio", as Lionsgate has a television syndication firm, in the form of Debmar-Mercury. 2600:1700:C960:2270:2901:76E5:C1BC:6ADB (talk) 05:30, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

 Question: Just wondering, if Liomsgate has a television syndication arm, why would we remove "television distribution" from the lead? It doesn't really make sense. Aoi (青い) (talk) 08:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done, Debmar-Mercury is, similarly to Lionsgate Films, a division of Lionsgate Entertainment, the parent company. Debmar-Mercury is separate and distinct from Lionsgate Films. Fish+Karate 09:07, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2019

• In the "Highest-grossing films", please remove the #11 and #12 entries, as they are unsourced and given the disparity between #11 and #10, it's unlikely that those were the next highest grossing films. 2601:241:301:4360:145F:3BFB:BCF2:DC85 (talk) 16:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• •  Done. Thanks for catching that. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250H VL1

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2023 and 4 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Averagestudent3, HarleyQ17.

— Assignment last updated by Highspeed2 (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2023

In the list of highest grossing lionsgate films, the link for Twilight: New Moon goes to Twilight: Eclipse, not the correct film. It needs to be replaced with the film here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Twilight_Saga:_New_Moon

Thank you have a great day. 2603:6000:B34B:E699:CDE4:E000:3C32:B277 (talk) 02:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done RudolfRed (talk) 19:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

The Little Mermaid

Please note that even I'm skeptical if this film is truly affiliated with Lionsgate but according to the trailer it is. However some details are vague rn and unclear if a new franchise is being formed. Apparently they are making a new Little Mermaid with a horror twist but so far isnt affiliated with Disney. Can someone help verify this cause I didn't want to add a film in any case of accidental backlash from false information sharing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1dfTzpfXdoSCPdude629 (talk) 03:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

This page should be renamed to Lionsgate.

Can someone move and rename this page to Lionsgate? 2A02:C7C:7C4D:5400:99B3:4258:E1A0:575F (talk) 18:28, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Requested move 3 July 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved Proposal was started by sock * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:51, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

---

Lionsgate Films → LionsgateLionsgate – The current title "Lionsgate Films" is not the common name. The company is commonly known as just "Lionsgate" across reliable sources and its own branding. Consistent with naming conventions for organizations. Diana0134 (talk) 03:28, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose. There are numerous entities listed at Lions Gate#Entertainment that are or have been referred to as "Lionsgate" and it is not clear which is the primary topic or if there even is one. I am aware of two recent discussions relevant to this issue: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 12#Lionsgate and Talk:Lionsgate Studios#Requested move 20 May 2025. There may be others. Previous suggestions have included making LionsgateLionsgate a distinct DAB page from Lions Gate, redirecting it instead to Lions Gate#Entertainment, or creating a set index article at Lionsgate. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 20:27, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

  making Lionsgate a distinct DAB page from Lions Gate was MY suggestion and till now I still stand by that, redirecting it instead to "Lions Gate#Entertainment" was the outcome of the RfD you cited (and I created, ironically and coincidentally) and the RM (which I'll state again that it was stemmed from InfiniteNexus trying to usurp a former title of over 2 decades with a studio formed just over a year ago), creating a set index article at Lionsgate. totally and obviously zilch/out of the question. The primary topic for the Lionsgate title is no primary topic, i.e. a DAB page, plain and simple! (See Universal Studios and its page history for proof relative to this.) Bear in mind that, since "Lionsgate" was renamed Starz Entertainment on 28 November 2024, no other discussion arose from a usurpation of this title, apart from these two you mentioned. I'm currently waiting till at least November to make a better RfD for this. The RfD I created was in haste as I was using a public internet café PC and my allotted minutes were running out. The Entertainment section in the Lions Gate DAB page should rather spin-out/spun-out and usurp the Lionsgate title and make the latter a DAB page instead. Intrisit (talk) 13:54, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

I would oppose because of the same points made by @Myceteae but also because "Lions Gate" could refer to a numerous amount of different things. GeorgeM2011^{(talk to me) | (My Edits)} 16:45, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Ping @Intrisit @InfiniteNexus @Pppery @Amakuru @ClarkKentWannabe, participants in one or both of the prior Lionsgate discussions I linked above. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 17:32, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Oppose - I will repeat what I stated for the other Lionsgate discussion: "Lionsgate Studios Corp isn't d/b/a-ing as "Lionsgate" & Starz Entertainment Corp isn't d/b/a-ing as "Starz". According to their respective articles, Lionsgate Studios Corp publicly operates as "Lionsgate Studios", while Starz Entertainment Corp does so as "Starz Entertainment". Also, Lionsgate Studios Corp's name is more than just "Lionsgate", much like Starz Entertainment Corp's name is more than just "Starz. Plus, it does make sense, eventually, to do a disambiguation for the "Liongsate" brand, due to both "Lionsgate Studios Corp" and "Liongate Films" existing, as there's the possibility some could refer to either property by nothing more than the "Lionsgate" name". ClarkKentWannabe (talk) 20:11, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

My thoughts exactly!! Lionsgate Studios Corp publicly operates as "Lionsgate Studios", while Starz Entertainment Corp does so as "Starz Entertainment" whether they operate with or without the "Corp" in their name has no bearing here per WP:NCCORP (See the latter's RfD). Like I stated on the above reply, the "Lionsgate" title must (not even should) be a distinct DAB page in its own right! Intrisit (talk) 14:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

How about this: User:Myceteae/lionsgate. I am happy to re-present to RFD. I suppose we should wait for this RM to be decided. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 23:34, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Lionsgate" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lionsgate has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 10 § Lionsgate until a consensus is reached. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 18:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

They should be added as an international sales agent.

This company should be added into the International sales agents category. ~2026-40443-9 (talk) 12:48, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Source? Mike Allen 20:16, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2026

update Michael box office ~2026-26070-46 (talk) 00:22, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. If you have specific numbers to share, please identify them and their source(s). LizardJr8 (talk) 01:02, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2026

update Michael box office

~2026-26070-46 (talk) 21:17, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 21:25, 7 May 2026 (UTC)