Talk:Lilo & Stitch 2: Stitch Has a Glitch

Trivia section

Trivia sections on Wikipedia are considered very bad form. All imformation within this section should be dispersed to apropriate places within the article. --The_stuart 18:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC) I thought we were trying to dispose of the trivia section and reintigrate the material with the article... after doing so, a new trivia section has arrived with information about a bonus feature that makes a distant bridge from this movie to the END of the Lilo and Stitch: The Series cycle. I'm not sure if this information is even needed, but if it is can we put it where it might otherwise belong? -- Zytron 16:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Jess Winfield/Alternate universes

"All these contradictions led Jess Winfield to state that this film takes place in an alternate universe. [citation needed]" If citation for such a claim can't be submitted, as well, it should be noted that even if this were true, he has no authority (writer or not, the property is owned by Disney) to state what is and isn't canon... only what he considers canon, then the quote should be taken down. Zero X Marquis 06:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

I removed the bit since it was uncited and it is unlikely that anyone will provide a proper source for it. No, forum posts don't count. It's speculation from a primary source. Despite the disparities, it does appear that this film is indeed canon. --Jtalledo (talk) 22:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Somehow it made it in again... I just re-removed the AU theory. Besides being terrible form to use all caps to make a point (which is corrected easily enough), the statement still unsourced. The contributor make allusion to a conversation with Disney (without names or dates), but that would be considered original research. Unless it can be found in print or recording that can be directly cited, this statement needs to stay out of the article. -- Zytron 06:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

• Zytron removed this text: "But, after talking with Disney, the reason "Stitch's Trial" was deleted was so that they could CREATE "Stitch has a Glitch", therefore none of this really happens outside of what is an apparently AU (alternate universe) game, Disney's Stitch Experiment 626."

Scott Erickson

While the distinction should be made between the two Scott Ericksons if they might work closely together, but I have removed the comment about the alleged employee misconduct unless a reputable cite can be offered to substantiate this alligation. Zytron 22:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Spoiler tags

Actually, I think the spoiler tag is appropriate here since it gives away the ending. --Jtalledo (talk) 22:04, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I think its concise enough in that its competent without. Its also stated in the main character's article so it should be fine.

On an unrelated subject I believe the Leroy and Stitch plot could use quite a bit of trimming. -Randall Brackett 23:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Saw the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Spoiler warning. It would have been nice to know that you're against spoiler tags... --Jtalledo (talk) 01:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

In this vein, while the discussion is ongoing I only remove them when I see them inapropriately placed. I don't think its constructive to have one beneath the plot header. That seems redundant. -Randall Brackett 03:00, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Experiment pictures of origin of stitch

Did anyone ever notice the experiments have different numbers in the origin of stitch (example 624 is 128 and 002 is 608 etc)

Reference to popular culture?

I believe one scene in the movie is a nod to the Peanuts character Charlie Brown. IN this said scene, Lilo is shown on her back in a position that mimics Charlie Brown on his back on the pitcher's mound. Her apperance from this angle also bears a slight similarity to Charlie Brown and even says something along the lines of "I wonder if Elvis ever had this problem".

Would this count as a reference to popular culture? --172.163.138.9 10:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

lol wut?

"she was replaced by renowned child actress and good friend Dakota Fanning.[1] ever since gonzo was an alien in muppets from space"109.224.137.121 (talk) 23:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Error under Production > Cast and Recording?

This sentence "Chris Sanders, the writer/director of the first film, did not participate fully." is not supported by the linked article. I believe this comes from a misunderstanding of the article where the writer states that Chris Sanders had "no involvement" with the film. I believe he meant no involvement other than voicing Stitch. I think this sentence should be removed as it implies Chris did not fully participate in voicing the character, which is untrue. 2600:6C5D:5000:1AD:C082:25DB:E0EA:36D9 (talk) 09:57, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Requested move 9 September 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:59, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

---

Lilo & Stitch 2: Stitch Has a Glitch → Lilo & Stitch 2Lilo & Stitch 2 – Lilo & Stitch 2 is more commonly used than Lilo & Stitch 2: Stitch Has a Glitch. We should not be using the long official name. 2600:1700:6180:6290:EDA7:5788:12EA:A961 (talk) 23:19, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose: There's a Game Boy Advance video game also titled Lilo & Stitch 2 (full title: Lilo & Stitch 2: Hämsterviel Havoc), and the live-action film's sequel was announced as Lilo & Stitch 2 (although that sequel's title could potentially change in the future). Likewise, this film is also referred to by just its unique subtitle. Even then, if we're going to drop film subtitles from their article titles, then why not move The Lion King II: Simba's Pride to just The Lion King II or Cinderella III: A Twist in Time to Cinderella III because people can't be bothered to pronounce or write subtitles for sequels? Either way, it's not a necessary move to make; the title is not that overly long, and the subtitle's presence makes it a good enough differentiator from the aforementioned other works titled Lilo & Stitch 2. –WPA (talk) 23:37, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose The common name claim has no proof, and therefore can't be taken seriously. All the sources don't appear to ignore the subtitle. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:02, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Oppose and make Lilo & Stitch 2 a dab page. Gonnym (talk) 10:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.