Talk:Legally Blonde

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sjones23 in topic Missing Plot Point
Good articleLegally Blonde has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 7, 2020Peer reviewReviewed
August 3, 2020Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Coripiazza.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

References to use

edit
Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
  • Dale, Carol N. (2006). "The return of pink: Legally Blonde, third-wave feminism, and having it all". In Feriss, Susane; Young, Malory (eds.). Chick Flicks: Contemporary Women at the Movies. Routledge. pp. 23–46. ISBN 0435863428.
  • Radner, Hillary (2019). "Legally Blonde (2002): A Pink Girl in a blue World?". Neo-Feminist Cinema: chick flick, and Consumer Culture. Routledge. ISBN 0415877733.

Is this the really the primary topic?

edit

Even though the movie undoubtly has more cultural impact it is an adaption of the book which came first, so theoretically the title of the article should be "Legally Blonde (film)", no? Anothracountiges (talk) 20:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Missing Plot Point

edit

Why is the revelation with the pool boy not in the plot summary? This seems to be an important point. I would like to add it. Mab157 (talk) 06:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, there. According to WP:MOSFILM#Plot, we should also avoid minutiae like dialogue, scene-by-scene breakdowns, individual jokes, and technical detail. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply