Talk:Law practice management software

Adding sections

I'm adding the usual sections such as See also, References etc. Bearian 00:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2016

Among the most popular are Abacus Law, Amicus Attorney, CaseFox, Descargar musica, Clio, Filevine, Firm Central,Legal Track,LEAP, HoudiniESQ, Lawcus, Legal Files, MyCase, Needles Case Management, PerfectLaw All-in-One Software, PracticeMaster, ProLaw, Rocket Matter, SmartAdvocate, Smokeball, and Time Matters. Leapsters (talk) 20:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

It IS clear what changes you want to be made. You want Wikipedia to include all those product links or, at a minimum, explicit mention of them, in this article on law/case management software. EvergreenFir said, "no" more politely than I would have, single purpose-one edit-no registered account editor. It was not done and it is not going to be done. Wikipedia is not a business directory per WP:LINKFARM

I don't want to be bitey to newcomers, so if anyone else comes along and reads this, and wants to add product examples, please do the following. If you have no conflict of interest, edit the article by providing a well-supported rationale, citing WP:NPOV and WP:RS sources. Possible rationales include but are not limited to:

• a particular product having established dominant market share; remember that any publicly-available information about the company's business practices or product, whether positive (e.g. widely acknowledged quality, user support, flexibility) or neutral even unsavory, will likely be mentioned too;
• a product associated with spectacular failure and the reason(s).

General tip. A list of companies doesn't tell us what you want. I presumed it was WP:PROMO. Maybe I am wrong. Avoid ambiguity by explicitly stating what you want changed. EvergreeFir can't read minds, so they responded appropriately, and likely the same as other editors would.--FeralOink (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 July 2016

Within the sentence beginning with 'Many forms of practice management software exist. Among the most popular are'. Eclipse Proclaim software should be added as this is case management software. The company states it has been around since the mid 1980's.

R19283 (talk) 09:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

References

It looks like "Eclipse Legal Systems" does not have its own WP entry right now, and it's unclear whether notability can be established at this time. Consider reading up on WP:GNG and provide a clearer argument for the addition. Not done for now for uncertainty. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 05:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Law practice management software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070726020851/http://www.njsba.com/NJSBAstatic/law_office_manage/dsp_software.cfm to http://www.njsba.com/NJSBAstatic/law_office_manage/dsp_software.cfm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070704123319/http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Law_Practice_Management&Template=%2FTaggedPage%2FTaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=58&ContentID=34979 to http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Law_Practice_Management&Template=%2FTaggedPage%2FTaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=58&ContentID=34979
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101227220549/http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/documents/downloads/softwaresolutionsguide2009.pdf to http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/documents/downloads/softwaresolutionsguide2009.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2018

We would like to add type of software called "Court Case Status Tracker" in the types of software in the law practice management software; the term CaseTracker is a rising term which helps lawyers to know about their cases. Zelican (talk) 11:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 13:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

It seems to be about the status check of court case, where lawyer can check his case related activities about next hearing of case, case posting date, order, Judgements or verdict of case.

References

Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2019

Please remove the "Law Practice Management Software" link in the External Links section because it directs to a specific vendor, www.cosmolex.com, rather than overview information of the general topic. Kchadez (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:52, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Improving the usefulness of the article and removing spam

I’ve noticed this article is currently quite thin and has historically struggled with SPAM. I am planning to expand the article to make it more usable, but also less spammy.

I recommend removing the list of products as well as the salesforce link (not law practice manageent software!) and provide some context of the industry from in-premises software (basically windows programs) to cloud and AI developments.

I'm going to be giving this article a stab today and during the next few days, feel free to drop any relevant pieces of research and links, but as it is now, the useful content has been nuked and the SPAM is still there to some extent. Bruroar (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)