A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:36, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Review after text expanded and references added

edit

Hi @EatingCarBatteries and @Aesurias,

Text for this (Lavinia Katia) player's page has been expanded, with references now added. Please review.

Regards, @Nhoj1898 Nhoj1898 (talk) 01:37, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi @EatingCarBatteries and @Aesurias,
Realised that in my request for you to review this biographical page (Lavinia Katai), I forgot to set a time frame.
As 7 days have passed since my edit and message, I shall add another 4 days.
So, could you please review by 2 December 2025. If I don't receieve a response by then, I shall removed the tag.
In my previous message I mentioned that the text on this page had been expanded and references added.
Regards, John @Nhoj1898 Nhoj1898 (talk) 18:30, 27 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
You don't get to "set a time frame", because this isn't a divorce hearing. The article is now sufficiently referenced. Best, aesurias (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I should add: in situations like this where you added a significant amount of sourcing (every single sentence in the page has a source now!), you can just be bold and remove the tag yourself. aesurias (talk) 22:07, 27 November 2025 (UTC)Reply