Wiki Education assignment: Reading Latinx Literature

edit

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 May 2025 and 16 July 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Joseph Borges (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Nayelimorocho (talk) 03:13, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

(The contribs link isn't working, here a fixed link: )
I have reverted these edits, as they did not cite any independent reliable sources for the claim that The term has also been used in contemporary memoir [sic] to affirm trans and gender-nonconforming Latin American identities and that this particular book exemplifies (i.e. is representative of) its usage in particular communities, leaving serious doubts on whether this particular use in a particular memoir should indeed considered relevant for this article, or whether the importance of this book for this article topic is rather the editor's personal opinion. (Use-mention distinction might also be worth a look.)
For what it's worth: The article about the book's author doesn't contain this claim either, in fact it doesn't even mention the term "Latinx" at all - nor do any of the reviews and other sources cited there in the section about the book (except a single interview with the author, where she uses it only a single time and doesn't discuss the term per se).
Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:38, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

It became a slur

edit

latinx didn't originate in English

edit

Latinx didn't originate in English calling it a English neologism when it originated in Spanish seems dishonest. Especially to say it so early within the article. ~2025-35199-06 (talk) 15:51, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Can you provide a source demonstrating this? signed, Rosguill talk 15:54, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
The articles currently has two sourced claims that state that the term originated in either a Puerto Rican psychology publication, or in Feministas Unidas i.e. a Spanish-language publication. For this to be categorised as an English neologism, we need the article to actually state that it is one. Cortador (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I agree and changed. Saying that it is an English originated neologism is not a fair summary of the sources. Sibshops (talk) 18:33, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply