Talk:Large Mindoro forest mouse

Rating Assessment

I have reviewed the article and i consider it to still be of "C" class, if it was to have some images of the animal then i would happily grant it "B" status as thats the only thing i can find wrong at this time. ZooPro 04:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

There are certainly no free images, so not much luck there. Ucucha 05:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Large Mindoro forest mouse/CommentsTalk:Large Mindoro forest mouse/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

== C-Class == This article will need quite a few more citations before moving to B-Class. BlindEagletalk~contribs 15:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC) == B-Class checklist == The article meets the six B-Class criteria: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary.It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The use of citation templates such as {{cite web}} is not required, but the use of tags is encouraged. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure.Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written.The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "brilliant". The Manual of Style need not be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately accessible way.It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. BlindEagletalk~contribs 16:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Substituted at 21:48, 26 June 2016 (UTC)