@Ningen2006: You are expected to explain your justification for your edits including self-published, unreliable sources, removal/modification of sourced content, and constant vandalism despite being warned. Sincerely, AdigabrekTalk
14:44, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @Erturk1996:
@Adigabrek: - it appears Ningen2006 is causing a lot of damage in a lot of articles. Syntax damage, adding random links that don't verify, questionable content, unexplained deletions etc.. it's often borderline vandalism and rarely an improvement. -- GreenC 05:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for your attention, @GreenC:, I don't know what to do right now. Sincerely, AdigabrekTalk
17:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
- @GreenC: he has returned as an IP now, can you help me get this page protected? Sincerely, AdigabrekTalk
20:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
- I don't think they will page protect based on 2 edits only 1 being an IP. They are now an established sock with a history of warnings and reverts a SPI might be required next. -- GreenC 21:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ningen2006. Not sure of the rules with SPI and use of IPs. If that doesn't work, next is request a blocked of the IP. -- GreenC 21:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply