Talk:Kodomonokuni Line
Latest comment: 26 days ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 11 May 2026
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 11 May 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Yokohama Minatomirai Railway Kodomonokuni Line to Kodomonokuni Line. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 11 May 2026
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 23:06, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Yokohama Minatomirai Railway Kodomonokuni Line → Kodomonokuni Line – It seems to fit WP:COMMONNAME that Googling "Kodomonokuni Line" provides about 13.2K results, and "Yokohama Minatomirai Railway Kodomonokuni Line" only provides almost 300 results. Also, per MOS:PRECISION, it is unnecessary to specify the whole name of the system that this line is a part of and I'd like to make WP:CONSISTENT with Minatomirai Line and other Tokyu lines. Here are some sources for "Kodomonokuni Line" only: Sinsyuan✍️PJTW 01:19, 11 May 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. 1isall (talk | contribs) 01:43, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
- I think that the
textabove might be unhelpful for this RM, Orz. Maybe it could be fit WP:CONCISE to title shortly.--Sinsyuan✍️PJTW 01:00, 12 May 2026 (UTC)- Support per WP:CONCISE. The entire official name as the title offers no real benefit while being much longer than necessary.
- Grilledcheeseisgreat ✉ 12:42, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


