| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Lfstevens, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 10 September 2025. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{Copy edit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: unreferenced |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kjell Arne Bratli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100602102423/http://www.fofo.no/Pennetjeneste.b7C_wZjG5K.ips to http://www.fofo.no/Pennetjeneste.b7C_wZjG5K.ips
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyedit
editIt makes no sense to copyedit an article that lists no sources. WP policy is that that uncited content should be deleted. The entirety of this article is uncited. It is all subject to removal. Lfstevens (talk) 06:18, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
- OK, then nominate it for deletion! Why are you getting hung up on the {{copyedit}} tag? You never replied on my talk page. Do not remove the tag until either the issue is fixed or discussion is settled. Please read Help:Maintenance template removal, specifically § When to remove and § When not to remove. — W.andrea (talk) 11:14, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- I don't delete stuff. But it is my job to remove a copyedit tag on a page that is by no means ready for it. It's a waste of valuable copyeditor time to consider pages like this. Endless pages have the copyedit tag that are reasonably cited. You may disagree with my edit summary, but the tag removal is completely valid. Lfstevens (talk) 23:42, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Why consider it then? I mean, why not just shelve (defer) it until it gets cited? — W.andrea (talk) 23:51, 11 September 2025 (UTC)It's a waste of valuable copyeditor time to consider pages like this.
- Please add citations before re-nominating for copy edit, the GOCE backlog is Sisyphean enough as it is. See also: Guild Howto:Uneditable content — Jon (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for reviewing! — W.andrea (talk) 21:35, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- I don't delete stuff. But it is my job to remove a copyedit tag on a page that is by no means ready for it. It's a waste of valuable copyeditor time to consider pages like this. Endless pages have the copyedit tag that are reasonably cited. You may disagree with my edit summary, but the tag removal is completely valid. Lfstevens (talk) 23:42, 11 September 2025 (UTC)