Talk:Junkers Jumo 204

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The same photo from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jumo205_cutview.JPG is used on three different pages representing different engines of two different manufacturers and three different engine models. In order to achieve some sort of credibility you must verify which of the three engine types this photo actually represents, and remove it from unapplicable pages. PatrickDunfordNZ (talk) 23:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

See reply here Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 00:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Company pronouns

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In English, one may refer to a company as "it" or "them", depending on context. For example one might say "It was founded in 1863", or "They launched their flagship Widget in 1927". There is no fixed rule, nor any WP:MOS guideline here that I am aware of, so editors should not change what others have written just for the sake of it. There needs to be another reason, such as a broader grammatical context. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic