| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Joyce Ladner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061129221052/http://www.dcwatch.com/schools/ps980313d.htm to http://www.dcwatch.com/schools/ps980313d.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Re: photo
editI think this is an unfair photo of her to use. I've seen other photos that make her look much better. I would prefer not to have a photo than to use a bad photo. Viriditas (talk) 23:50, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- I see images from 2023 and 1995 that look fine. This photo just has bad lighting and the angle is all wrong. It doesn't even look like her. I think it should be removed. Viriditas (talk) 00:55, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- I removed it. There are several non-free photos to choose from that look great. Viriditas (talk) 00:57, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- FWIW, this is an ongoing problem I keep running into on Wikipedia and I've commented on it several times on many different talk pages. If you have the choice between a bad free photo and a good non-free photo, do not choose the bad one. I don't understand why other people can't also agree with this. Why would you ever upload a bad photo of a subject? I don't understand the thinking here. Viriditas (talk) 00:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Update: As an example of the problem, take a look at the photo of her sister Dorie Ladner. An incredible photo! Viriditas (talk) 23:14, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- FWIW, this is an ongoing problem I keep running into on Wikipedia and I've commented on it several times on many different talk pages. If you have the choice between a bad free photo and a good non-free photo, do not choose the bad one. I don't understand why other people can't also agree with this. Why would you ever upload a bad photo of a subject? I don't understand the thinking here. Viriditas (talk) 00:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)