| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
talmud article
editit looks very clear to me that this article was not written by josh bornstein. not only does it use a lot of /pol/ memes, theres also this: http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/42271853/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skairim (talk • contribs) 16:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
This is a promotional piece of marketing fluff
editThis should be deleted. There is nothing noteworthy about the subject of the article: no landmark cases, no academic distinctions, no important legal publications. Nothing but involvement in some parochial Australian court cases that have no wider significance. This belongs in the 'About Us' section of the promotional website of a legal firm not in Wikipedia. AnotherPseudonym (talk) 10:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Assessment
editThis remains a stub because it does not appear to have any factor that could make it a Start article. It really needs a lot of work. Bearian (talk) 13:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)