Talk:Josef Hoffmann
A fact from Josef Hoffmann appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 April 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editAll contributions by 83.65.92.98 seem to be C&P from here.Davidrowe 10:35, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Language revision
editOk, tried to remove some of the POV material... maybe it will be seem something different
Just out of curisoity, is there any article in this explaining WHY Hoffman demonstratively left Künstlerhaus? And why is the Siebener Club reffered to as "so-called"?
Hoffmann was no Czech
editThere had been a lot of changes during the 20th century in Central Europe. Wide parts of nowadays Czech Republic for instance were populated by the so called German Bohemians, people who were Germans by culture and language and who distincted themselves from the Czechs or Slovaks. Being citizens of the Austro-Hungarian Empire they can be called Austrians or German Austrians. After 1945 they were driven out from Czechoslovakia, and most of them fled to Germany.
The changes done by 58.173.19.245 are wrong. Hoffmann was a German Bohemian. His home town Pirnitz (today Brtnice) near Iglau (today Jihlava) was then a German town situated in one of the German enclaves of Moravia (also Brünn, nowadays Brno, was situated in such a German enclave). Hoffmann couldn't even speak Czech. He was welcoming the Anschluss of Austria by Germany in 1938. - In other words: If Hoffmann would be Czech, then Immanuel Kant would be Russian or rather Kaliningradian, and my mother as East Prussian would be Polish. -- Achsenzeit (talk) 22:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (1).jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (1).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Woluwe-St-Pierre - Hoffmann 050917 (1).jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC) |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Jewish?
editWas Hoffmann Jewish? The name sounds Jewish, he had a lot of Jewish patrons and friends, but he welcomed the Anschluss though he did not subscribe to the Nazi aesthetics [source: German language version of this article]. Does anyone know? Hansung02 (talk) 09:24, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced material removed
editI removed the following section since it is not supported by references to reliable sources --Srleffler (talk) 17:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Critical reception and posthumous reputation
editHis international exhibition work helped to make his name widely known, and many distinguished contributors to the Festschrift on his 60th birthday acclaimed him as a master.[citation needed] Honours bestowed on him included the cross of a commander of the Légion d'honneur and the Honorary Fellowship of the American Institute of Architects. The critic Henry-Russell Hitchcock in 1929 wrote, "In Germany as well as in Austria, Hoffmann's manner has profoundly influenced the New Tradition".[citation needed] Only three years later, however, when he published The International Style together with Philip Johnson, Hitchcock no longer mentioned Hoffmann's name. Siegfried Giedion in his influential Space, Time and Architecture did not do justice [clarification needed] to Hoffmann's oeuvre because it would not fit easily into his polemically simplified version of architectural history.[citation needed]
Despite honours and praise on the occasions of Hoffmann's 80th and 85th birthdays, he was virtually forgotten by the time of his death. Although his true stature and contribution were acknowledged by such masters as Alvar Aalto, Le Corbusier, Gio Ponti and Carlo Scarpa,[citation needed] the younger generation of architects and historians ignored him.
The process of rediscovery and reappraisal began in 1956 with a small book by Giulia Veronesi, and gained momentum during the 1970s with a number of exhibitions and smaller publications. [where?][citation needed] In the 1980s several monographs were published and major exhibitions held. [where?][citation needed] Imitations of his style also began to appear, and replicas of his furniture, fabrics, and of some objects he had designed became commercial successes, while original pieces and drawings from his hand fetched record prices in the auction-rooms. [where?][citation needed] Srleffler (talk) 17:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

