 | A news item involving Joey Beauchamp was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 February 2022. |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Joey Beauchamp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004220336/http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/archive/1999/11/19/6634636.Joey_hits_U_s__greatest__goal/?ref=arc to http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/archive/1999/11/19/6634636.Joey_hits_U_s__greatest__goal/?ref=arc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Death
editHi there, sorry, I've not done this before and apologies if this is not the best route. But I have a question: is there a reason why you've included the means by which the subject took his own life? The reason I ask, as both a Samaritan listening volunteer as well as an Oxford Utd fan, is that the advice to media from Sams in terms of articles covering suicide is not to be explicit about this kind of info. The two media references, for example, don't give this detail. Grateful for your thoughts on this. Thanks. Rodger Evans 90.243.90.179 (talk) 15:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- I share your concern (as a fellow Oxford fan and as a human being). The relevant Wikipedia policy would appear to be MOS:SUICIDE. There doesn't appear to be any advice there on mentioning the means, but perhaps there should be. It might be worth opening a discussion at WT:MOSMED, which is probably the best place to discuss the wider issue where more people, particularly experienced Wikipedians qualified to comment in this sensitive area, will see it. Dave.Dunford (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)