 | This biographical article uses the pronouns he/him. See JayR Tinaco. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Inconsistency in date of birth
editThere's an inconsistency in their date of birth in the article itself vs. in the infobox. It needs addressing. Melias C (talk) 19:40, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Anybody home? There's still 2 very different birth dates on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:ED:6706:8E09:6895:48E8:15C:512E (talk) 20:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Pronouns
editThe article states that it uses "they/them" for consistency, but "he/him" pronouns are used in one paragraph of this very short page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.55.220.45 (talk) 21:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Right. I think I just fixed that one instance. My guess is that someone used "he" there and it just wasn't corrected yet until now. --Historyday01 (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- I believe he said that he prefers he/him pronouns.War (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Well, in that case, we should use those pronouns and perhaps add a note they are being used as to avoid confusion from other users who may and try and change it to they/them.--Historyday01 (talk) 12:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- I believe he said that he prefers he/him pronouns.War (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
image
edit"These should still be decided on a case-by-case basis, based on an actual analysis rather than simply "they're bad"." you do not have a broad consensus, or policy basis, to remove images. please discuss before unilaterally removing reliable sourced content. Turktimex3 (talk) 16:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)