Talk:Isidora Sekulić Award
Latest comment: 9 months ago by 2001:4BB8:103:F3DF:0:0:F85F:7200 in topic Edits by blocked User:R.Saringer
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Edits by blocked User:R.Saringer
editLarge parts of this article were written by the blocked (sockpuppet) accounts User:R.Saringer and User:AustrianFreedom. Most of the recent anonymous editors Special:Contributions/2001:4BB8:0100::/40 were probably the person behind these accounts as well. See e.g. Special:Diff/1309081455. Since the latest version of the article was full of incomprehensible and unsourced stuff, I restored an old revision. — Chrisahn (talk) 03:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Come on, please! What is Your Problem? Your goal is simply to prevent any improvement in quality. You don't represent a neutral position 2001:4BB8:103:F3DF:0:0:F85F:7200 (talk) 21:24, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- I'd like to improve quality, or at least keep it from deteriorating. As I said in my edit comments, I removed stuff that was largely incomprehensible and unsourced. If you want to edit Wikipedia, you have to follow the rules: Everything you add must be supported by Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and of course the text you add must be written in comprehensible English. — Chrisahn (talk) 21:29, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- For example, the following sentence doesn't make any sense: "Royal Majesty also attempted Cosmopolitan policy for modern Serbia of peaceful Future." Sounds like something Borat might say. :-) — Chrisahn (talk) 21:34, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- Please, let it be, Your Vandalism! What is Your Sound? You know nothing about the topics. Do you have a voring evening or somergkng like that, that you make yourself important? 2001:4BB8:103:F3DF:0:0:F85F:7200 (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- I have no interest in an edit war. Your self-righteousness as a registered user makes the article factually worse, not better. 2001:4BB8:103:F3DF:0:0:F85F:7200 (talk) 21:45, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- Unbelievable! You can't stop your vandalism and hunger for power 2001:4BB8:103:F3DF:0:0:F85F:7200 (talk) 23:24, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- I have no interest in an edit war. Your self-righteousness as a registered user makes the article factually worse, not better. 2001:4BB8:103:F3DF:0:0:F85F:7200 (talk) 21:45, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- Please, let it be, Your Vandalism! What is Your Sound? You know nothing about the topics. Do you have a voring evening or somergkng like that, that you make yourself important? 2001:4BB8:103:F3DF:0:0:F85F:7200 (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- For example, the following sentence doesn't make any sense: "Royal Majesty also attempted Cosmopolitan policy for modern Serbia of peaceful Future." Sounds like something Borat might say. :-) — Chrisahn (talk) 21:34, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- I'd like to improve quality, or at least keep it from deteriorating. As I said in my edit comments, I removed stuff that was largely incomprehensible and unsourced. If you want to edit Wikipedia, you have to follow the rules: Everything you add must be supported by Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and of course the text you add must be written in comprehensible English. — Chrisahn (talk) 21:29, 8 September 2025 (UTC)