Talk:Interstate 40/Archive 2

Latest comment: 4 years ago by DesertPipeline in topic Image positions and table floating
Archive 1Archive 2

Image positions and table floating

Hello, Imzadi1979,

While the image positions as I changed them to may not be ideal for accessibility reasons, it did improve the visual layout of the page. What accessibility reasons are there exactly for not doing it that way? Also, disabling float on the table gives more space for the images. I don't think it looks very good in this position anyway. Can we discuss these things? Thanks, DesertPipeline (talk) 03:41, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

User:Imzadi1979: Sorry; I forgot User: at the start so it didn't ping you. I need to use the preview option consistently. DesertPipeline (talk) 03:47, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Images should be contained within the sections to which they relate, not appended to the end of the previous section. Otherwise, it can mess things up semantically for those using screen readers. Imzadi 1979  03:55, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
User:Imzadi1979: I'm not sure, though, what the utility of an image is for someone having to use a screen-reader. Presumably they'd just have the caption read out? DesertPipeline (talk) 03:59, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
The point is, if you move an image above the header, it now belongs to the previous section and gets read out as part of the previous section. Or the reader skips it completely because he/she jumped to a specific section and past the previous section that contains the image. In short, it's considered a bad idea to put images ahead of a section heading.
In any event, we have to remember that people consume Wikipedia on different size screens, on both desktop and mobile devices, so your "don't think it looks very good" may not apply to someone else's platform. Imzadi 1979  04:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
User:Imzadi1979: People don't "consume" Wikipedia; they view it. A page's material is still there after one person has viewed it, because their viewing of it doesn't use it up. Anyway, I digress. Yes, you're right about the different screen sizes and such. But is there a way we can make it look good in all cases? DesertPipeline (talk) 04:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
There's no layout that will look good in all cases. Imzadi 1979  04:16, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
User:Imzadi1979: Can we at least change the table back to not floating? I think it looks better that way. DesertPipeline (talk) 04:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Actually, never mind; I've looked at it more carefully and I think it looks fine. DesertPipeline (talk) 04:22, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
User:Imzadi1979: Are you okay with my latest change where I moved the second image in the "California" section back to the right? On my screen, it makes for a lot of blank space with no text when both are on the left. DesertPipeline (talk) 07:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
User:Imzadi1979: Your last edit makes the second image in the California section appear in the History section for me. I would suggest we put both images in a {{Multiple image}} template below the text, orientated horizontally and using the |total_width= parameter, either left-aligned or in the centre. What do you think? DesertPipeline (talk) 02:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
See below for examples. DesertPipeline (talk) 02:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
The total_width could be decreased maybe. Currently it's set to 600. DesertPipeline (talk) 02:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
User:Imzadi1979: What do you think? DesertPipeline (talk) 06:39, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
User:Imzadi1979: I've put the images in a left-aligned Multiple image template and set the total_width to 400. Do you think that looks okay? DesertPipeline (talk) 08:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Another possible option would be to put the images on the right vertically, with a single caption between them (on my screen, however, the second image appears in the History section):
Personally I think that having the images below the text is better than this, but what are your thoughts? DesertPipeline (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

User:Imzadi1979: I think it might be better for the layout to put the multiple image template below the text. It doesn't have to be left-aligned though; would you rather it was centred? At least if it's below, it avoids the problem that occurs with monitors wider than mine where the length of text is insufficient to fit the images. I suppose this is a general problem with all right- or left-aligned images, though. Making websites look good is hard. It's a shame there's no "fix-all" solution. DesertPipeline (talk) 07:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Exit list for Greensboro

Number Mile Destinations Notes
Old
208 Sandy Ridge Road
210 NC 68 - High Point/Piedmont Triad International Airport Greensboro
211 Gallimore Dairy Road
213 Guilford College Road
214 Wendover Avenue split into 214A and 214B eastbound
216 NC 6 east - Coliseum Area eastbound exit and westbound entrance
217 High Point Road/Koury Boulevard/Coliseum Area
218A US 220 south to Interstate 85 Business south - Asheboro US 220 joins eastbound and leaves westbound
218B Freeman Mill Road
219 Interstate 85 Business south/US 29 south/US 70 west - High Point/Charlotte no westbound entrance; I-85 Business, US 29 and US 70 join eastbound and leave westbound; I-40 west splits from I-85 Business south via exit 36A (old exit 123)
36 124 Randleman Road exit 36B westbound
37 125 South Elm-Eugene Street - Downtown
38 126 US 421 south - ML King Jr Drive/Sanford US 421 joins westbound and leaves eastbound
39 127 US 29 north/US 70 east/US 220 north - Reidsville eastbound exit and westbound entrance; US 29, US 70 and US 220 join westbound and leave eastbound
41 128 NC 6 to US 29 north/US 220 north - East Lee Street
43 130 McConnell Road
44 131A Interstate 85 south/to US 70 - Charlotte (Future Interstate 840) I-85 joins eastbound and splits westbound; I-85 Business begins westbound and ends eastbound; I-40 west splits from I-85 south via exit 131

(other old exit numbers on I-85 are 120 - Groometown Road, 121 - Holden Road, 122A-B - US 220, and 122C - Rehobeth Church Road)

long distance mileage signs

Photos: Western end at Barstow, CA from , eastern end at Wilmington, NC from

 Preceding unsigned comment added by Polaron (talkcontribs) 23:26, 28 July 2007 (UTC)