This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intensive farming article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights
This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
The ancient world, while knowing little about the reproduction of oysters, knew much about the conditions necessary for their growth.
Could you qualify the highlighted part of your entry with a citation? If it is your or popular opinion, it should be removed.
How is a legitimate question regarding un-sourced opinion considered vandalism on a DISCUSSION page? I didn't edit the actual article, yet merely discussing an opinion which I believe has no merit that is entered as fact.
A user User:Aleksa Lukic recently moved this page without discussion to 'Intensive type of farming'. The term 'Intensive farming' is an appropriate title for this article, and no justification was given for the move other than the edit summary 'more appropriate page name'. I oppose the move, and it is not at all clear that 'type of farming' is the more appropriate name. For example, a quick check of google scholar reveals 20,000+ articles with 'intensive farming' in the text, and less than 100 with 'intensive type of farming'.