Talk:IndyCar Series
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IndyCar Series article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
"Formula Indy" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Formula Indy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 20 § Formula Indy until a consensus is reached. 65.92.244.237 (talk) 20:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
"F-Indy" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect F-Indy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 20 § F-Indy until a consensus is reached. 65.92.244.237 (talk) 20:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
"the most popular types of U.S. motorsport" - citation needed
editAfter thinking Wikipedia has much larger problems, I proposed to simply modify in "one of the" so NASCAR and NHRA fans won't protest, arguing from a "citation needed" (I like both of two, no problems). What's more the focus doesn't change if we prove or not it was the most, since first Indy 500 was in 1911 and this is sufficient to give a historicity proof. gtp (talk) 09:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
needs a full re-write
editThis page is simply horrible. It needs to be gone through thoroughly for usage, tense, clarity, and readability. 2600:2B00:6A16:1100:CD69:766E:D0C:D7AC (talk) 13:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- The prose could certainly be improved, but I don't know if a full rewrite is necessary. Your copyedits were definitely helpful, and I made a few tweaks as well. Zeibgeist (talk) 00:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC)