Talk:Indian 2000-rupee note
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian 2000-rupee note article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
@14.139.196.2: This is an encyclopedia, such trivial and non-encyclopedic details doesn't belong here. See WP:NOTDIR. If you think there are some type of encyclopedic value of the content of the lists, please give any independent source that provide commentary on these details. — MBlaze Lightning T 13:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
language panel
edit@Hydloc009: You have repeatedly inserted this into a bunch of articles, the onus is on you to explain why it should be added, not on other editors to explain why it should not. As it happens, the stuff that you added has no encyclopedic value. They're inappropriate for an encyclopedia and doesn't belong here per WP:NOTDIR. — MBlaze Lightning T 17:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- @MBlaze Lightning: I came across you removing the languages from the articles of ₹10, ₹20, ₹50, ₹100, ₹500, ₹1000 and ₹2000 banknote articles.
- The language panel shall be in the banknote articles - because just as security features of a banknote is listed on any banknote article, the language panel (17 languages on Indian banknotes) should also be listed on Indian banknotes article - as it is one of the features of the Indian banknotes. The languages are not a directory, they are in the language panel on reverse of the banknote - a feature of the banknotes. Thank you, Regards. Hydloc009 (talk) 19:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Please consider them adding in main article
edit- 1. No new security features [1]
--Swami16 (talk) 07:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
References
- ↑ "No time to add new security features in notes, says official". The Hindu.
- ↑ "Rs 2,000 notes a temporary arrangement, will be ultimately withdrawn: RSS ideologue". Business Standard India. 13 December 2016.
- ↑ http://www.heronewsonline.com/new-notes-of-rs-500-and-rs-2000-are-a-temporary-measure/.
{{cite news}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
- India new 2000 INR, MG series, 2016, obverse.jpg (discussion)
- India new 2000 INR, MG series, 2016, reverse.jpg (discussion)
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:36, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
False information
editNotes were distributed before 8th November 2016 122.162.217.36 (talk) 14:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)