Talk:Inauguration of Pope Leo XIV

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 21 December 2025

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif talk 22:14, 28 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Saint Peter's Square during the inauguration
Saint Peter's Square during the inauguration
Converted from a redirect by Darth Stabro (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 40 past nominations.

~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 15:39, 19 May 2025 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Everything looks good here. Partial to ALT0 just because the second one is kind of a self-report by the Vatican. Either would probably be fine though since it's NYT we're talking about. Great work as usual! ThaesOfereode (talk) 20:11, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

    GA review

    edit

    The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


    This review is transcluded from Talk:Papal inauguration of Pope Leo XIV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

    Nominator: Darth Stabro (talk · contribs) 15:42, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

    Reviewer: GoldRomean (talk · contribs) 01:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply


    Hi, I'll take this. Please note, however, that it may take me a while (possibly up to a week or two), depending on how busy I will be; if this is going to be a problem, apologies, and please let me know so I can end the review and let someone else take this. Best, GoldRomean (talk) 01:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

    Criteria

    edit
    Good Article review progress box
    Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
    3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
    Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

    Source review

    edit

     Pass - S1. Representing the cardinal deacons... then bestowed the Ring of the Fisherman upon the pontiff. GoldRomean (talk) 02:36, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

     Pass - S4. Leo expressed a desire for unity and communion in the Church and in the world. GoldRomean (talk) 02:36, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

     Pass - S11. After his inauguration, Leo met with Peruvian president Dina Boluarte... GoldRomean (talk) 02:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

     Pass - S42. Saudi Arabia, Minister of Foreign Affairs Adel al-Jubeir and Prince Faisal bin Sattam Al Saud GoldRomean (talk) 02:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

    Sources are all good. Excellent job on this. Ref layout looks fine as well. GoldRomean (talk) 02:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

    Images

    edit
    edit
    1. Public Domain
    2. CC BY-SA 4.0
    3. CC BY-SA 2.5
    4. Public Domain
    5. CC BY 2.0
    6. Public Domain
    7. Public Domain

    Note: It looks like #3 is nominated for deletion on Commons. Funnily enough, the reason is that it is a clone of another image, which is also nominated for deletion for being a "inferior version" of the current image. Either way, the discussions aren't GA image criteria-related; plus, if the current image does get deleted, it shouldn't be too hard to replace with the other one. GoldRomean (talk) 02:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

     Pass, caption review to follow. GoldRomean (talk) 02:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

    Captions

    edit

    Prose review

    edit

    Feel free to disagree, just let me know why. Signing for ease of reply, if you use visual editor. I will provide things in an "X to Y" format or just give the suggested edit with changes bolded.

    Lead

    edit

    Ceremony

    edit

    Homily

    edit
    • recalling the two-fold aspects of ministry entrusted to Saint Peter, love and unity. Leo expressed a desire for unity and communion in the Church to recalling the two-fold aspects of ministry entrusted to Saint Peter; love and unity, expressing a desire for unity communion in the Church - try to also find a way to avoid mentioning "unity" twice so close together GoldRomean (talk) 18:05, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
      incl in above ~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 01:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

    Subsequent activities

    edit

    Comments

    edit

    The initial review is complete. Putting on hold, you have 7 days to address the comments. Overall great job. Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 18:09, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

    Ping: @Darth Stabro. Also, the UN delegation needs a source! GoldRomean (talk) 18:10, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
    Thanks for the review, GoldRomean. I'd appreciate it if you're able to extend the revision time by a bit, you've caught me at a time when I'm about to be out of town for a week. I'll try to get at the revisions soon after I return. ~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 15:25, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
    @Darth Stabro - No worries! Take your time, I can give you until August for now, and more if needed :). GoldRomean (talk) 17:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
    @GoldRomean: initial concerns have been addressed, other than a few things I disagreed with and left my reasoning on. ~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 01:59, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
    @Darth Stabro - looks good, will take a look later today and probably pass. And noticed that this is today's DYK, so congrats :D. GoldRomean (talk) 16:45, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
    Ok, later today... or right now. Passing. GoldRomean (talk) 16:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

    C2d: Earwig gives 30.1% . Some WP:CLOP, but pass. GoldRomean (talk) 18:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    Requested move 21 December 2025

    edit
    The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

    The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 21:45, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply


    – Being WP:CONCISE, similar reasoning to the discussion about moving all the conclave articles from "[year] papal conclave" to "[year] conclave". There really aren't any other inauguration events about the popes, so there's no need to specify the type; "Pope" is already in the name. Sources also don't tend to say "papal inauguration", but simply "inauguration"; cf. sources on the respective pages. ~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 21:24, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

    Support, it's redundant to repeat pope/papal twice DCAllStar (talk) 23:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
    The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.