Talk:Hyperrealism (visual arts)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hyperrealism (visual arts) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hyperrealism (visual arts). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070504201929/http://www.artinfo.com/News/Article.aspx?a=16964&c=175 to http://www.artinfo.com/News/Article.aspx?a=16964&c=175
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Themes section
editDoes anyone else think that the themes section is essentially gibberish? "Helnwein developed unconventionally narrative work that centered on past, present and future deviations of the Holocaust. Provocative subjects include enigmatic imagery of genocides, their tragic aftermath and the ideological consequences." What exactly is meant by "unconventionally narrative"? One could understand this in reference to novels, perhaps (though it would still lack specificity), but in relation to realist paintings, what could it mean? What is a "deviation" of the Holocaust (as opposed to a Holocaust)? How can an image of genocide, especially a realistic image, be "enigmatic"? And what might "ideological consequences" encompass? In short, this doesn't give the reader meaning so much as it uses words as mere signposts to point at a meaning which is elsewhere, and which, in the end, the reader has to take on faith as being actually present in the paintings. The discussion either needs to be more comprehensive and specific, or it needs reproductions of actual paintings to give it some point. Otherwise, it's just airy generalizations, at attempt at suggesting deep thought and social engagement without actually giving us any of the content of those deep thoughts. In short, gibberish. Theonemacduff (talk) 17:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Mischaracterized
editThis article begins wrong. Sorry I'm not skilled at editing, but look at this reference: https://mymodernmet.com/hyperrealism-history/
Major museums are a good source of defining art movements and styles, due to the large number of misconceptions online.
Hyperrealism is not an attempt to resemble a high resolution photograph. "Hyperrealists used advancements in high-definition photography as a jumping-off point into expressions of false realities" So, although inspired by photography, the paintings are meant to go beyond what photography can express. For example, they often will not copy the flaws or limitations (no out of focus areas, no optical defects, distortions). It is not "photographic in essence". The article is a mix of fact and misconception, and thus self-contradictory... Then there is the "Themes" section which seems to be a collection of irrelevant tangents.24.236.70.18 (talk) 13:42, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Noob to wikipedia here. I arrived at the page wanting to see what it said. And I wholeheartedly agree with the above. I am an unheralded photorealist painter and when the hyperrealist term first came across my radar twenty years ago the artists who used this newer term to differentiate themselves used this very argument. They tried to explain that the use of computers could lead to them ignoring the limitations of the camera. Also they talked about how they were creating more socially aware art rather than the plain old visual tricks that you see with photorealism. BertErnieArtist (talk) 05:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Art Librarianship
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2026 and 14 May 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KangaRool (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by KangaRool (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2026 (UTC)