Talk:Humanist minuscule

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Humanist minuscule appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 February 2011. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that humanist minuscule handwriting, invented in the fifteenth century in Italy, was based on Carolingian minuscule, which Renaissance humanists took to be ancient Roman?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2011/February.

Wikipedia

Spelling?

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I believe lettera antiqua should be littera antiqua (Latin) or lettera antica (Italian), no? My references all use littera antiqua (as earlier in this article in the plural, litterae antiquae).

Also, is this the same as "Roman bookhand"? Other articles in Wikipedia use that term and perhaps should be linked to this one. - PKM (talk) 04:56, 2 February 2011 (UTC) (enthusiastic amateur but by no means an expert on this subject)Reply

litterae antiquae (plural) should be correct and lettera antiqua (inserted here) looks like a misspelling to me. @Wetman: can you confirm if that is the case? --Neitram (talk) 09:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

The gothic hand violated three principles

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"For Petrarch the gothic hand violated three principles: writing, he said, should be simple (castigata), clear (clara), and orthographically correct."

@Wetman: I have trouble understanding the last point. What does orthographical correctness have to do with handwriting style (gothic or other script)? --Neitram (talk) 09:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Antiqua (typeface class)

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page and Antiqua (typeface class) should have more interlinkage, or perhaps even be merged if we want to cover them both in the same article (one is just the mechanical reproduction of the other — most of the Antiqua (typeface class) article is actually its history section, which is just what this page covers). Dingolover6969 (talk) 18:07, 18 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Add topic