Talk:Huawei P30

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ZoeWZY. Peer reviewers: ZoeWZY.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

No mention of cellular connectivity

Came here looking to know what cellular connectivity this thing has, and there's no mention of it. --uKER (talk) 18:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Huawei P30 Lite

Just like on the P20 page, the P30 Lite is not mentioned once. Can we get on that? I apologize if this sounds rude, I just think we really need to get on that for this, the P20, and any other Huawei device that doesn't have their Lite version mentioned in their articles. {{subst:JdRDMS|21:54, 11 October 2019}}

I agree! Strangely enough, they are mentioned in Huawei P series. I think it might be because the "lite" (not "Lite")'s version isn't mentioned (except in the support page) in Huawei's US website. It is mentioned though in their other local websites, such as Canada. -Cardace (talk) 05:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

"VOG-L04 11.0.0.170(C792E10R1P3)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect VOG-L04 11.0.0.170(C792E10R1P3) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § VOG-L04 11.0.0.170(C792E10R1P3) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Huawei P30 is getting redirected soon

Despite being the last Huawei device to had Google Mobile Services it has no enough information to be fully read by readers it has almost many paragraph but it's still short the deadline date before redirection is on May 1st and it would be permanently be listed in list of Huawei products and never having standalone page due to short notable paragraphs HelloIMEditingSometimes2026 (talk) 13:19, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Oppose: This is not a useful merge rationale, and generally you shouldn't unilaterally merge an article without discussion, even if you warn people beforehand. If you think this article should be deleted or redirected, you need to take it to Articles for Deletion with a clear, policy-based rationale, and let consensus form, not declare a date when you will be redirecting it. Being "short" is not a good deletion rationale. (Sometimes it's a good merge discussion rationale, but I think there is enough here that a merge doesn't make sense.) - Purplewowies (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2026 (UTC)