Talk:Historically significant lunar eclipses
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 204.113.155.58 in topic What's a "lost Ethan"?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Historically significant lunar eclipses article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
A fact from Historically significant lunar eclipses appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 May 2010. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
What's a "lost Ethan"?
editCurrently the lead paragraph includes:
Throughout history lunar eclipses have been held to be responsible for such circumstances as lost Ethans ....
What's a "lost Ethan"? Why should anyone care? If this can't be answered well, the reference to "lost Ethan" should be removed. Oaklandguy (talk) 06:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, it was vandalised by 64.188.238.24 (talk · contribs) on 2017-05-03. Thanks for highlighting - Ninney (talk) 06:33, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi enyone who uses wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.113.155.58 (talk) 14:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

