Talk:Health effects arising from the September 11 attacks

The last (single sentence) paragraph of the lead summary should be moved to the first

edit

It also needs to stated somewhere within the article itself, as the lead summary should be only what its name says it is (a summary of the article). 94.246.147.217 (talk) 08:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Missing the word "Radiation" and/or "Radioactive"

edit

I've been listening to stories about the "toxic dust" from 9/11 for decades. The dust was either tested for radioactivity or it was not. This Article should at least mention the subject of radioactivity, one way or the other. The fact that the Article is silent on the subject is an indicator that Wikipedia is complicit in some kind of cover-up. Wikipedia is not censored, and yet this question about 9/11 appears to be intentionally left-out. Here because I read an Article about a person that died from cancer after she survived 9/11 and the natural question was whether or not it was radiation that caused the cancer that killed her. Why is radiation and cancer an acceptable topic with Chernobyl, but not with 9/11. Did they test for it or not? If not, then SAY that. Make people wonder why not.72.180.111.79 (talk) 00:07, 26 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Toxic does not mean radioactive. There are no sources that discuss any radioactivity associated with 9/11 so it is not discussed here either. There are plenty of other dusts, like silica, that cause cancer but are not radioactive. -- Reconrabbit 15:44, 26 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: History of Modern East Asia

edit

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2026 and 30 April 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AcrossCenturies (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by AcrossCenturies (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Should we add suicides arising from trauma due to the attacks?

edit