Talk:Hammerskins

Latest comment: 11 months ago by TonySt in topic Lealtà e Azione

Untitled

edit

RfC

edit

Pink Floyd

edit

Wonder why they didn't sue them? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lealtà e Azione

edit

I stumbled across this while doing RCP. I find myself agreeing with some of @Marticvs' points at their talk page. I do not speak Italian but Google Translate's version of the source indicates Lealtà e Azione is an "offshoot" or a "metapolitical evolution" of the Hammerskins, not the name of the group itself. The inclusion of names here also warrents more sourcing than provided. Pinging participants in that discussion here: @ChildrenWillListen, @Drmies. —tony 16:12, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Interesting. Il loro ramo italiano è invece rappresentato da Lealtà&Azione apparently translates to "Their Italian branch is instead represented by Lealtà&Azione," which could either mean they're a part of Hammerskins or a spin-off, which isn't very clear since I do not understand the nuances of that Italian phrase. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 16:20, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oh, feel free to tweak, User:TonySt, but the argument of "unreliable sources" was not valid. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:20, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Drmies, I'm unfamiliar with L'Espresso but I have no problem taking your word for it being an RS. I'm probably not going to "tweak" the section because I don't have confidence in my ability to interpret the two L'Espresso articles used as references, but judging by the Google Translate versions I have serious doubts as to whether the section is accurate as written (is it an offshoot, or is it "inspired by," or is it actually a rebrand?) Per WP:BURDEN I'm not even sure it's this new user's responsibility to make changes instead of blanking. —tony 16:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply