Talk:Gray code
| This is the talk page for discussing Gray code and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Well-balanced
editAn IP editor claims the expressions are different from what's given in the ref. ~Kvng (talk) 13:18, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- The number of transition in each dimension is necessarily even. The IP's claim look therefore plausible, while the current claim in the Wikipedia article must be wrong. --FvdP (talk) 15:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Lucal code?
editI'm not sure why the table of values at the very top of the article also includes a different coding scheme which is not explained anywhere else nor has an article of its own. It makes the table more difficult to read while not adding anything that's related to the article, I suggest it's best removed Ruse.mp (talk) 07:58, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Circumference of hypercube
editThis edit states that the circumference of a d-dimensional hypercube is 2^d, and cites a source I haven't access to. The statement seems weird to me; 2-dimensional figures (possibly embedded in d dimensions) have perimeters, and for some (cricles and ellipses) they are also called circumferences, but d-dimensional figures do not. There may be a standard way to define something called the circumference of a d-dimensional object, but then we should at the very least wikilink "circumference" to an article with such a definition, and this is not it. Despite the source, I'm inclined to remove the statement. Nø (talk) 08:09, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- I'll cut that phrase. —Antonissimo (talk) 00:16, 23 May 2026 (UTC)