Talk:Google Guitar

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google Mobile Services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Musical Instruments

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments

Software: Computing

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Animation

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 June 2011. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Google Doodle#June 9–10]]

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Definitely notable

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Every major media outlet is covering this today. Pianotech ^{Talk to me!}/_Contribs 21:59, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Added a ref and removed speedy. Google Guitar is notable (today, anyway).

AfD - fair enough. :) My main concern was rescuing it from an undeserved speedy. Pianotech ^{Talk to me!}/_Contribs 22:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

yeah maybe i was a little too quick on the speedy, you have to admit though the first draft of the article looked like speedy delete material. I didn't realize it was that well covered in the media. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 22:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Definitely, the first draft was bordering. Prior to that, I removed a "patent nonsense" speedy on it because I guess someone thought it was a hoax. :) Anyway, good call on the AfD. Pianotech ^{Talk to me!}/_Contribs 22:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The topic has Encyclopedic merit. It is a nominal leap in Google theme design, and it has triggered a public and a media interest that does beg dispassionate objective explanation not found elsewhere. It has a 'current events' nature that is best served only by Wikipedia and the knowledgeable editing and expansion found here.

I would expect to find discourse on and links to:

history of Google themes, notable themes
encoding and/or structure (for web developers)(expanded, referenced, copyrights, patents, credits )

I'm sure there's more that others can think of.

"It exists, will someone please explain it" --Ssaco (talk) 22:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic