Talk:Go! You Packers Go!

Latest comment: 11 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

Untitled

edit

Is the song still under copyright? Ifso, the lyrics should be deleted. Youngamerican 19:40, 19 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Go! You Packers Go!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 18:53, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 23:08, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Feel free to disagree with anything. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Comments

  • I don't think the quote marks in the first sentence of the lead are supposed to be bolded. I just changed it myself. See this other song GA for precedent (Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?)
  • "wrote the words of a fight song" link fight song on first instance
  • "Karll copyrighted the words to the song the same year he wrote them and began working with local musicians to compose sheet music for it." Perhaps change to "Packers song" here because the prior sentence talks about a different song.
  • The body of the article says Welk owned the first recording but then the article starts talking about the Lumberjack Band owned it and then Welk bought it again? I read Ref 12 and it looks like Welk only owned it once. Suggest rearranging this section to make the timeline clearer for readers.
  • "Go! You Packers Go!” was one of the earliest fight songs for an American football team" unlink both of these, already linked above
  • Link touchdown in lead and body I guess?
  • Image licensing looks good

Spot checks

  • Ref 4 Article says "Karll, who was raised in Iowa, was a strong supporter and fan of the Packers." It doesn't look like the source is talking about Eric Karll. That part of the source is referring to his great nephew.
  • Ref 7 looks good.
  • Ref 8 looks good.
  • Ref 12 looks good.

Nice work! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:06, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

WikiOriginal-9 I think I got everything. Thanks! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:57, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I still don't see in the source where it says Eric was a Packers fan. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:38, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Bullet point 4 about Welk wasn't addressed either. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
WikiOriginal-9 sorry, not sure how I missed those. I reworked it a bit. I think the difference is the lyrics versus the first recording. Tried to make that clearer. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:30, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 68 past nominations.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Both articles are newly-promoted GAs. Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply