| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gina Carano article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Allegedly controversial.
editLede should say “allegedly” controversial political tweets.
it’s impossible for journalists to make that value judgment regardless of how forcefully they say it
especially in light of Disney settling and loknginfjrward to working together. 216.15.107.204 (talk) 23:17, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- “Controversial” is not a judgment statement. The comments were by definition controversial. Rcarter555 (talk) 09:32, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yes it is. And because the vaunted USA today said so it's fact to wikipedia... tabloid aggregator that it is. 131.106.15.127 (talk) 04:32, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
2020s section
editoriginal: In february 2022, Carano explained her social media posts, saying that she "shared a meme, I translated into: Don't let the government pit you against each other or history tells us that could go wrong." Some fans and commentators contrasted Carano's firing with fellow The Mandalorian cast member Pedro Pascal suffering no consequence for making comparisons between the treatment of Jews in concentration camps and the treatment of undocumented migrant children at ICE detention facilities in the US. Carano was defended by The Mandalorian co-star Bill Burr, who described her as "an absolute sweetheart" and criticized her firing.
this sections feels overly defensive of her actions, personally I would consider replacing it with something like this:
in February 2022, Carano justified the social media posts, saying that she shared a meme, translated into: Dont let the government pit you against each other or history tells us that could go wrong.
while far shorter I feel like the additional content does little than make a needless comparison, while the absolute sweetheart remark has nothing to do with her explaining her actions. Russianchoir (talk) 16:53, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- Her “actions” so-called, require no defence or explanation, and are deserving of nothing but applause. ~2025-43438-74 (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- well then why not remove the needless comparison and let her actions speak for herself? Russianchoir (talk) 11:50, 11 February 2026 (UTC)




