Why is this article only hyperfocused on the AOL deal? It seems to be biased towards the removal of a rival and the AOL deal, but nothing about his tenures at Time and HBO (he was responsible for the national launch of the network and led the channel for nearly 20 years), his ascension to the Time Inc. board of directors, and his roles at Time Warner, including some of the decisions he was a part of, including the company's acquisition of Turner Broadcasting (probably one of the most successful business mergers of all time and one that set up the foundation of the company now known as Warner Bros Discovery to this day). It seems that this article just wants to paint Gerald Levin as some incompetent boor when the opposite is true. Nemalki (talk) 17:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply