Talk:Freedom of panorama

Latest comment: 9 months ago by Janke in topic Maps don't agree

FOP US section

edit

Since there is now sufficient material for the U.S. section of Freedom of panorama article, is it feasible and logical to separate it into a standalone article (like, Freedom of panorama in the United States)? More things can be covered once it is separated into a standalone article, though I am not sure if it is within the bounds of enwiki article policy and if it can be sustained in the long term. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:04, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@JWilz12345: I don't see any problem in developing subsidiary articles as suggested. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 10:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
@RobbieIanMorrison I decided not to create a spin-off article of FoP US section. The current FoP article is stable and detailed enough. In fact, the German Wikipedia version (w:de:Panoramafreiheit) is more than 300K in page size, far larger than this enwiki version. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
@JWilz12345. Noted. (And I'll point out that page length statistic to my German lawyer friends.) RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 12:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Problem with neutrality

edit

There are many references to localities having "sufficient" or "adequate" FoP. Unless someone explains soon how these don't constitute a violation of Wikipedia's neutrality, I will edit them all. Yitz711 (talk) 21:36, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Maps don't agree

edit

Maps of world vs. Europe don't agree regarding Sweden, should be corrected. Janke | Talk 10:00, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply