| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Note to reviewers
edit| The content of Age (model theory) was merged into Fraïssé limit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The content of Fraïssé's theorem was merged into Fraïssé limit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This page is intended to be a merger of Age (model theory) and Fraïssé's theorem, due to large overlap between them. I chose the title since it seems to have the most hits on Google, as well as in the literature.
So, if this page is accepted, then those two articles should be deleted, and redirects set up from
- Age (model theory)
- Fraïssé's theorem
- Fraïssé theory
- Fraïssé amalgamation
- etc
to this article.
--Jordan Mitchell Barrett (talk) 22:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Things to do
edit- Needs way more citations and references
- Expand more on history and applications to other fields (I am not an expert on this)
- A categorical diagram could be helpful to illustrate the AP
- More examples
- More about ω-categoricity
--Jordan Mitchell Barrett (talk) 22:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Also - can someone explain what finitely-generated / n-generated mean in this context? Jordan Mitchell Barrett (talk) 20:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- This is defined in the article, but, maybe, this has been added after your post. D.Lazard (talk) 14:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
I read "how one can approximate": I don't get what "approximation error" means here, which means that I just don't get it, period.Lewis Goudy (talk) 12:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- This article has nothing to do with numerical approximations. Here, "approximation" must be taken in its informat English meaning, and is here as a tentative for explaining the purpose of the theory. In any case, the first sentence says clearly that the article is not for readers that know nothing of mathematical logic. D.Lazard (talk) 14:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
