Talk:Flint water crisis/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Flint water crisis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
The last line of Political Responses cites an irrelevant source
Never edited a wiki page, so I'm adding this as a talk topic instead.
The line "Liberal Flint-born filmmaker and activist Michael Moore, angry about the endorsement, devoted a podcast episode to this issue" is cited by source 398, which is about a mother working to increase the settlement amount in a civil lawsuit. I think this line should then be re-sourced or deleted, right?
Lreinirz (talk) 15:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Lreinirz,
Done. I removed it, since Michael Moore is already mentioned in another section. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Novem Linguae, cool. This whole talk section can be deleted. I'll read up a bit on how to edit articles in future. -Lreinirz (talk) 23:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
End date
Why is January 2017 the end date??? Synotia (moan) 12:20, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Good question. Someone changed it without an explanation. The source says 2019. I changed it back. TomCat4680 (talk) 21:35, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Economic and Management Sciences
Save Water Save Life 41.114.191.223 (talk) 14:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Article protected 1 week
Due to a content dispute resulting in an edit war, I have protected this article for 1 week.
I confess I don't see a problem with the most recent addtition by the now-blocked editor. The reason given for removal was that it cites YouTube, but the participants in the dispute should have known better. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#YouTube clearly states: "Content uploaded from a verified official account, such as that of a news organization, may be treated as originating from the uploader and therefore inheriting their level of reliability." Such is the case with this citation. So what exactly is the problem? ~Anachronist (talk) 04:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Tbh, the editor's behavior obscured my attention from the content itself along with the IP warning in the previous edit summary suggesting they were trying to insert themself into the story. I stepped back when I saw how it escalated. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Racism?
There were mentions that Flint being poisoned was at least partially due to racism, since Flint has a large population of Blacks. However it was later discovered that there are many cities that actually had far worse cases of lead in their water, and gained little public and media attention. So isn't the real racism that the news made a big deal about Flint to push a race issue while ignoring worse cases in cities with less Blacks? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:90C8:503:BE18:ED94:9429:CE0F:EE0E (talk) 06:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Additions to mental health section
I will be adding information about a study conducted on the citizens of flint by the CDC, and how the crisis affected them Naz2844 (talk) 23:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)