Talk:Fiona Martin
.svg){kind=small} | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (centre, colour, realise, program, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Sex Discrimination Act
editI believe it was in fact the religious discrimination act, https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r6821 — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnAugust (talk • contribs) 11:28, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Removal of referenced material
edit@Sleepyscribe: has repeatedly sought to delete the following from the article In April 2022, media reported that Martin faced allegations she employed a former babysitter in a taxpayer-funded role worth up to $90,000 a year, despite them having no political experience. The media report also claimed that her office experienced ‘a mass exodus of 15 staff members’ from 2019 to 2022.
and Martin lives with her family in Ryde.
These have been reverted by Tacyarg and myself. I note that — Sleepyscribe (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The only explanation given by Sleepyscribe was in the 3rd edit summary "Removed incorrect reference to suburb. Removed misleading reference to article." Both passages are referenced to reliable sources. Questions of balance only arise where when reputable sources contradict one another. --Find bruce (talk) 05:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Removal of election incident
editWhy is the reference to her confusing candidates being removed? It made national headlines and arguably contributed to her defeat. 2A00:23C6:D512:CE01:9CD3:49A0:BC0E:CE5F (talk) 13:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)