Talk:Fetus

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Klbrain in topic Merge proposal

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fetus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Out of place file

edit

Ought the file of fetus at gestational age 9 weeks be removed as this is a file of an embryo (7 weeks fertilisation age).--Iztwoz (talk) 21:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Removed

Fetere

edit

I distinctly remember reading somewhere that the word fetus comes from the Latin word fetere, meaning to stink. I’m assuming this was wrong? 63.231.140.53 (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The word "fetus" is from the latin word FETUS meaning offspring, while the unrelated word FETERE is related to our word "fetid." Boonerquad (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 December 2021

edit
 Some authors [39] argue that fetal pain

In the above quote from the fetal pain section, the space between "some authors" and the reference ought to be removed. 122.150.71.249 (talk) 06:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Done LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 14:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Comparison of fetal size to fruit which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. RMCD bot 12:56, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

edit

I propose merging Comparison of fetal size to fruit into fetus. The origin article is 93 words long, per WP:SIZERULE, it should either be marked as a stub or merged to another article. Upon visiting the fetus article, it seems as this would fit under Development in humans > Variation in growth, or as it's own subsection under Development in humans. Oakchris1955 (talk) 15:08, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

* Strong support - And thank you, I saw that article and had not gotten around to putting that one up for deletion, but merge would be better; there is no indication that the subject itself has notability WP:GNG for a standalone article. ---Avatar317(talk) 00:04, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Strong support Loggerton (talk) 13:47, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
  checkY Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply