Talk:Feminists: What Were They Thinking?
| This article was nominated for deletion on 10 July 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that an image or photograph of Feminists: What Were They Thinking? be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Sources
edit- http://www.dailynebraskan.com/culture/netflix-original-documentary-feminists-what-were-they-thinking-explores-gender/article_bddbe80c-d1b5-11e8-90e0-573a6a991fd2.html
- https://www.elle.com.au/culture/netflix-documentaries-20766
- https://dbknews.com/2018/10/17/feminists-what-were-they-thinking-netflix-documentary-review/
"Missed opportunity"
edit"The film does include the significant contribution of Lesbian women to feminism, but it is noted that it missed an opportunity to include trans women." This opinion is taken from an article which only lists Marsha P. Johnson & Sylvia Rivera as trans women who could have been included, but neither Johnson or Rivera were to my knowledge ever involved in second-wave feminism, and are therefore outside the scope of the documentary. It seems silly to offer this as a reasonable & neutral critique on wikipedia--if we started listing all the things documentaries don't include we could be here all day. It also has nothing to do with the 'premise' so if it were kept in it should be under a new section for reception or criticism (but I don't frankly think this is necessary because the article doesn't seem to be very significant). 2A00:23C5:3D05:B101:F118:B2C4:75D3:30E0 (talk) 17:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)



