Talk:European Sleep Apnea Database

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the European Sleep Apnea Database article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 24, 2014	Articles for deletion	Kept

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 October 2014. The result of the discussion was no consensus, default to keep.

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Also called European Sleep Apnoea Cohort

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Also called European Sleep Apnoea Cohort.

Part of the problem in researching this is that they go by so many different alternate spellings and names! — Cirt (talk) 16:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Other languages

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've seen coverage of this article topic in other languages.

I'm not the most adept at searching news archival databases of other languages, so if anyone's willing to help do that, it'd be most appreciated.

— Cirt (talk) 17:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Update: Removed all medical conclusions from article

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Update: Removed all medical conclusions from article, and kept reported methods used. Please see DIFF.

Readers and editors (if they so desire) may subsequently check and read the cited articles for themselves if they wish to find further information on the actual results and conclusions from the cited studies.

Now the article simply states that such studies were carried out, without documenting what the results or conclusions were.

Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 00:18, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I see it as a reasonable compromise that addresses his concerns. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:24, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 02:34, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

that is helpful, thanks. Jytdog (talk) 13:09, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

You're most welcome! :) — Cirt (talk) 13:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic