Talk:End of the Century
| End of the Century has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 21, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the End of the Century article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:End of the Century/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 22:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: CrowzRSA
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.
--Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the review Seabuckthorn, I know the lead and Reception section both need work. Hopefully I'll be able to rewrite/cite them later. Again, thanks :)CrowzRSA 16:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)- Thanks, CrowzRSA, very much for your extraordinary diligence in writing such great articles. Okay! No worries!
--Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, CrowzRSA, very much for your extraordinary diligence in writing such great articles. Okay! No worries!
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

|
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Check for WP:LAYOUT:
|
Check for WP:WTW:
Check for WP:MOSFICT:
|
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes - b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
excellent (Thorough check on Google.)
Check for WP:RS:
|
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:
|
- c. No original research:
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects: |
|---|
|
b. Focused: |
|---|
|
4: Neutral
4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:
Yes
6: Images
Done (NFC with a valid FUR)
Images: |
|---|
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
|
CrowzRSA, I'm very happy and inspired to see your extraordinary dedication and diligence here. As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. ![]()
Promoting the article to GA status.
--Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)