I just saw that this article is nominated for speedy deletion, by user @Liturgy:, but I do not see any real reason for such hasty and drastic action. It seems to me that this article is quite relevant, and since Edmond Paris was a controversial author it would seem improper not to discus any issues regarding the very article about him and his works. If someone does not like his provocative works on religious politics, that is OK, but that is not a sufficient reason for speedy deletion. Actually, his critique of religious extremism and clero-fascism is quite relevant, and he is often quoted in scholarly literature. That much can be easily seen on Google Scholar search and Google Books search. Sorabino (talk) 13:58, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
- It seems that original nomination for speedy deletion was changed to proposed deletion and the change was explained by the same user @Liturgy: His full length biography from primary sources is left wanting; it may even be a pseudonym. I can't find any information about him except for his books. I doubt the personality of Edmond Paris. Regarding those doubts, I looked for institutionally backed information about the author and found him regularly catalogized under the name Edmond Paris by Library of Congress Name Authority and also by Bibliothèque nationale de France: Notice de personne, without any mention of alleged pseudonym. It seems that professional librarians in Washington and Paris do not doubt the existence of this author. Sorabino (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
- Thank you for your reply. I saw the Library of Congress Name Authority and also by Bibliothèque nationale de France Notice de personne pages. But Is this enough information to expose us all? This person's identity is still a mystery. We don't know about his birthplace, family relations, educational background, career etc. And Is he regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors in the academic world? Again, His full length biography from primary sources is left wanting. Is this page a really worthy of notice? Can we find more informations about him? --Liturgy (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply